콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

COMPANY TYPE IN KOREA: “The Limited Company (Yuhan Hoesa)”

COMPANY TYPE IN KOREA: “The Limited Company ( Yuhan Hoesa )”

( by Andrew Baek , July 25, 2024)

 

Continuing from the previous article on the types of companies available in Korea, this article will now examine the “Yuhan Hoesa”, which translates to Limited Company.

Prior to 2011, the Limited Company corporate structure was under many legal restrictions, such as the maximum number of members allowed, restrictions on the transfer of equity interests, and the minimum capital required for their establishment. Hence the term “Limited” came more naturally. However, most of the restrictions have now been abolished to encourage the establishment and promote the growth of Limited Companies.

In comparison with the Stock Company, the main difference would be that, on the upside, the Limited Company can maintain a higher level of secrecy, while on the downside, it is not easy for such a company to raise capital from external sources.

Unlike the Stock Company, the Limited Company is not required to submit annual business reports nor make public disclosures, unless under exceptional circumstances such as being part of a Business Group Subject to Disclosure. However, if it reaches a certain size, it will be subject to external audit, and the audit reports will be sent to the Securities and Futures Commission, and the Korean Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
Also, unlike the Stock Company, the Limited Company cannot issue any equity-based securities (e.g., shares) nor any debentures. Capital increases are typically made by admitting a new investor as a member, who receives investment units as equity interest.
A Limited Company can choose to convert to a Stock Company. Previously, such conversion always required unanimous consent from all members and a resolution at their general meeting. However, the Commercial Act has been amended to allow this conversion with a special resolution at the general meeting (a majority of all members and 3/4 or more of their voting rights) if the Articles of Incorporation provides so.
It may be due to these characteristics, especially the higher level of secrecy, that many large multinational companies establishing a local company in Korea choose this corporate structure. Establishment and business operations may also be more convenient than a Stock Company, considering the comparatively simple document preparation at incorporation, the ease of internal decision-making, and the absence of a limitation on the term of office for a director, whereas in a Stock Company, a director would need to extend their term of office every three years.

A Limited Company must appoint at least one director to represent the company and execute its corporate affairs. Where there are multiple directors, decisions are made by a majority vote of the directors. Notwithstanding, major business decisions, such as transfer or acquisition of business, and execution or termination of material contracts, require resolution at the general meeting of members.
Interestingly, in a Limited Company, the Articles of Incorporation can be written to structure the members’ voting rights at the general meeting to concentrate power within a few hands, although the standard allocation is one vote per unit of investment. This facilitates easier management and control, particularly suitable for companies held closely by a small group of individuals.

In conclusion, it is safe to say that the Limited Company corporate structure of Korea, or the Yuhan Hoesa, is well-suited for well-resourced, closely held entities or family-run businesses, offering a balance of liability protection and operational flexibility, as well as a closed nature. Additionally, this type of company too can be registered as a Foreign-Invested Enterprise under the the Foreign Investment Promotion Act.

 

If you are considering establishing a local company in Korea and would like to learn further details and characteristics of diverse corporate structures in Korea, feel free to contact us via email at inpyeong@inpyeonglaw.com.

End.

법률사무소 인평의 칼럼은 일반적인 법률 정보를 고객에게 제공되고 있으며, 이에 수록된 내용은 법률사무소 인평의 공식적인 견해나 구체적인 사안에 관한 법적인 효력을 지닌 법률자문이 아닙니다. 구체적인 사안에 대한 법률의견이 필요하신 분들은 법률사무소 인평의 변호사에게 공식 자문을 요청해주시면 감사하겠습니다. 본 게시물의 저작권은 작성자에게 있으며, 무단전재 및 재배포를 금지합니다.

관련 구성원
조윤상 대표변호사·변리사

Andrew Baek 외국변호사

abaek@inpyeonglaw.com

Michael Baak 외국변호사

Recent Posts
스톡옵션 한도 회복에 숨겨진 함정 - “이미 행사했는데 왜 또 못 주나요?”
[기업 필수가이드] 2026년 표준취업규칙 발간 - 고용노동부(26년2월)
[전자금융업] 전자금융거래약관 작성, 보고 매뉴얼 - 금융감독원(26년1월)
주주의 외로운 싸움, 그러나 주총 소집허가 결정이 전부는 아니다
이사 보수 결의, 대주주 지분율로는 부족 - 특별이해관계인 의결권 제한과 주주총회 실무 대응 전략
[전자금융거래법] 2026 전자지급결제대행업(PG업) 개정 주요사항
용역계약서의 미지급 성과급/성공보수 청구소송, 청구 대응방안
error: Content is protected